I was creating some demo non-clustered indexes in one of my Azure SQL Databases and received the following warning when I executed this code:
Times are changing, 10 years ago I would never have thought that self-tuning databases would be available as a packaged product. I was testing out SQL Server 2017 Automatic Tuning recently and I ended up with the following situation. Below shows an image from the query store.
DBCC CHECKDB has the ability to perform parallel checking of objects. However, it absolutely depends on the edition of SQL Server, it only happens when using enterprise edition.
Let’s see this in action. I propose the following tests for this blog post:
- Test on a SQL Server Enterprise Edition.
- Test on a non-enterprise edition of SQL Server.
I could not read my error log on one of my local SQL Servers, when I executed the following code:
I received the below:
Msg 22004, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 Failed to open loopback connection. Please see event log for more information. Msg 22004, Level 16, State 1, Line 2 Error log location not found.
If you know about DBCC CHECKDB then most likely you will know about DBCC CHECKTABLE. Quite simply this command performs primitive system-catalog consistency checks, per-table consistency checks on the single table specified, and cross-table consistency checks on indexed views that reference the specified table. (Page 899 Microsoft SQL Server Internals 2012, Chapter 14, Page 899, Paul Randal)
I worked on testing interleaved execution with Microsoft back in January, I didn’t do much, just tested the functionality against some in-house code we had. (If you need a detailed primer on the subject, please see https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/sqlserverstorageengine/2017/04/19/introducing-interleaved-execution-for-multi-statement-table-valued-functions/)
Let’s start off with a quick overview of SQL Server versions and compatibility levels.
- 100 = SQL Server 2008 and Azure SQL Database
- 110 = SQL Server 2012 and Azure SQL Database
- 120 = SQL Server 2014 and Azure SQL Database
- 130 = SQL Server 2016 and Azure SQL Database
- 140 = SQL Server 2017 and Azure SQL Database
So with SQL Server 2017 now available to the public what level is a newly created Azure SQL Database set at?
With Halloween around the corner what better topic to discuss than phantom reads. A phantom read occurs when rows have been inserted after a read operation and becomes visible in a follow-up read operation within the same transaction.
So I had a corruption issue and I was thinking about running repair but I wanted to know what would potentially get deleted.
Here is a quick Extended Events script I knocked up where I wanted to track Tempdb file size changes for both the data and log file. I wanted to know who caused the tempdb growth, when it was done, what the T-SQL was and what sizes were involved. Not exactly complicated but hopefully useful.